Bug 2633 - derivations are involved compounding where they shouldn't be
Summary: derivations are involved compounding where they shouldn't be
Status: ASSIGNED
Alias: None
Product: sme lexicon
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Continuation lexica (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Macintosh Other
: P5 - Later enhancement
Assignee: Thomas Omma
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-11-01 14:17 CET by Linda Wiechetek
Modified: 2019-11-01 14:19 CET (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Linda Wiechetek 2019-11-01 14:17:39 CET 
Here we have an example where derivations are involved compounding where they shouldn't since only the underived version is a compound. (Have we talked about this before?)

Dát lea čielga hálddahuslaš dássi, gos prošeakta virggálaččat registrerejuvvo ja álggahuvvo.


prošeakta virggálaččat is analyzed as a compound (Err/Space) even though only
prošeakta virgi should be analyzed as such. 
But since virggálaččat is derived from virgi, this is what happens.
Comment 1 Thomas Omma 2019-11-01 14:19:25 CET 
prošeaktavirggálaččat	prošeaktavirgi+N+Der/lasj+A+Comp+Attr	0,000000
prošeaktavirggálaččat	prošeaktavirgi+N+Der/lasj+A+Comp+Sg+Nom	0,000000
prošeaktavirggálaččat	prošeaktavirgi+N+Der/lasj+A+Der/AAdv+Adv	0,000000
prošeaktavirggálaččat	prošeaktavirgi+N+Der/lasj+A+Pl+Nom	0,000000
prošeaktavirggálaččat	prošeaktavirgi+N+Der/lasj+A+Sg+Acc+PxSg2	0,000000
prošeaktavirggálaččat	prošeaktavirgi+N+Der/lasj+A+Sg+Gen+PxSg2	0,000000